Psychological Report Intelligence for Attorneys

Your expert answered
the psychological question.
We answer the legal one.

Send us the psych evaluation from your case. We return a complete attorney memo — plain-English summary, Daubert flags, case strategy, and deposition questions — in 24 hours.

Psychologist · Biomedical Engineer · Statistician — the combination that catches what others miss · $150 per report

Every analysis includes five sections
01
Plain-English Summary
What the report actually says — no psychology degree required
02
Case Strategy
What helps your client, what hurts, how opposing counsel will use it
03
Daubert Flags
Scientific validity reviewed — find the challenges attorneys miss
04
Deposition Questions
Targeted cross-examination questions from the specific findings
05
Test-by-Test Translation
Every instrument explained — MMPI-2, PAI, MCMI-III and more
🎓
Columbia · USC · UVADoctoral research · MS I/O Psychology · BS Engineering
🏥
Clinical Research BackgroundLead Statistician, Kaiser Permanente
📊
Psychologist + Statistician ValidatedBoth lenses on every output — clinical and quantitative
24-Hour TurnaroundReady before your deposition
The Gap We Fill

Attorneys receive reports
written for clinicians, not courtrooms.

Research across attorney forums, legal tech surveys, and forensic psychology literature confirms what litigators already feel.

34%
Can't decode the jargon
Reports arrive written for psychologists. Attorneys can't translate T-scores, validity indices, and diagnostic criteria into case strategy without a psychology degree.
22%
Report doesn't answer the legal question
The evaluator answered the psychological question. Nobody told you which findings help your client, which hurt, and how opposing counsel will use them.
17%
Expert consultation costs too much
A clarifying consultation runs $300–500/hr. For solo and small firm attorneys, that cost makes thorough deposition prep a luxury, not a standard.
13%
Reports arrive too close to deadlines
Evaluations take weeks. Reports land 48 hours before depositions — no time to find anyone who can explain what you're reading.
8%
No Daubert guidance
Only 5.1% of psychological assessments are ever challenged — not because they're solid, but because attorneys lack the tools to evaluate them.
6%
Other failures
Experts who exceed scope, missed communications, inaccurate summaries — compounding a core comprehension problem that starts the moment the report arrives.

Five sections.
Everything you need to walk in prepared.

01 / 05
Plain-English Summary
What the report actually says, written for a non-psychologist. Every finding translated into clear, jargon-free language you can use directly in client conversations and case planning. No psychology training required to read it.
Addresses 34% of attorney complaints
02 / 05
Case Strategy Section
Which findings support your client's position. Which findings opposing counsel will weaponize. How to frame each in argument. Written specifically for your practice area — personal injury, family law, or criminal defense.
Addresses 22% of attorney complaints
03 / 05
Daubert Vulnerability Flags
Is this assessment tool peer-reviewed and generally accepted? What is its known error rate? Were the validity indices administered correctly? We identify the reports that should be challenged but rarely are — grounded in published psychometric literature, not guesswork.
Unique to CaseSignal AI
04 / 05
Deposition Questions
Targeted cross-examination questions derived directly from this report's specific findings. Designed to surface validity problems, expose methodological gaps, and challenge interpretations that exceed what the data supports. Ready to use or adapt.
Ready for deposition prep
05 / 05
Test-by-Test Translation
Every psychological instrument used in the report — MMPI-2, PAI, MCMI-III, PCL-R, Rorschach, and more — explained in plain language. What the score means, what the normal range is, what this specific result indicates for your case, and whether the interpretation the evaluator drew is statistically supported by the data. Covers over 300 assessment instruments.
Covers 300+ instruments
The Process

Four steps. 24 hours.

01
Send the report
Email us the PDF. Redacted or full — either works. No client information required.
02
We analyze and validate
Every test score reviewed against published normative data. Daubert flags verified against peer-reviewed literature. Nothing ships unvalidated.
03
You receive the memo
A formatted attorney memo: all five sections, clearly organized, within 24 hours of receiving the report.
04
Walk in prepared
Take your deposition with full command of what the report says, what it means, and exactly how to challenge it.

Built for three specialties.

Personal Injury
IMEs, psych damage evals
Family Law
Custody, parental fitness
Criminal Defense
Competency, sanity evals
Common → IME / Neuropsych / PTSD / Damages
Turn the opposing IME into your strongest cross.
Personal injury cases turn on how psychological damage is framed. The opposing IME often minimizes your client's injuries — but many are scientifically challengeable. We flag F-scale elevations, identify malingering assessments with questionable validity, and tell you exactly which findings to contest and which to embrace.
  • MMPI-2 and PAI validity scale interpretation
  • Malingering assessment challenge strategy
  • Emotional distress damages framing
  • PTSD diagnosis support and Daubert review
Common → Custody / Parental Fitness / 730 Eval
Understand the custody evaluation before opposing counsel does.
Custody evaluations are among the most consequential — and least understood — documents in family law. We tell you which parenting findings cut in your client's favor, which personality scale elevations the other side will weaponize, and how to prepare your client for follow-up questions about findings they don't understand.
  • Parental fitness assessment interpretation
  • Child attachment and developmental findings
  • Personality disorder findings — legal framing
  • Evaluator methodology review for bias
Common → Competency / Sanity / Risk Assessment
Challenge the competency evaluation with scientific precision.
Competency and sanity evaluations carry enormous stakes — and many are never challenged despite significant methodological limitations. We review the instruments used, identify whether conclusions are supported by the data, and flag the specific findings that open the door to meaningful cross-examination.
  • Competency to stand trial — ECST-R and MacCAT-CA
  • Criminal responsibility and mental state findings
  • Violence risk assessment (HCR-20, PCL-R) analysis
  • Insanity defense evidentiary support
Work With Me Directly

Need more than a memo?
Hire more of my time.

The report analysis is where most attorneys start. But if you need deeper involvement — a walkthrough call, ongoing case support, or expert consultation — that's available too.

📄
Report Analysis
$150
per report
The core product. Send the report, receive a complete attorney memo in 24 hours covering all five sections.
  • All five analysis sections
  • Analyst-validated output
  • 24-hour turnaround
  • Formatted attorney memo
🤝
Ongoing Case Consultation
$200
per hour · as needed
For complex cases requiring deeper involvement — multiple reports, deposition strategy sessions, trial prep, or ongoing expert consultation throughout the case lifecycle.
  • Multiple report analysis
  • Extended deposition strategy
  • Trial preparation support
  • Retained engagement available

Expert analysis.
Not expert fees.

"How is this $150 when a forensic psychologist charges $400 an hour?"
It's the right question — and it deserves a direct answer.
1
The knowledge is encoded, not replaced
A forensic psychologist charges for their time — scheduling, intake, reading, the call. That domain knowledge is encoded into a validated system. You get the expertise without paying for the hours.
2
A psychologist and statistician validates every output
AI can hallucinate. Every analysis is reviewed by someone with both psychology degrees and a statistics background — catching clinical misinterpretations and statistical errors before the output reaches you. That dual lens is the quality control.
3
Scale makes the price possible
A boutique expert sees a few cases a month. We've built a system that scales without sacrificing rigor — and that efficiency is passed directly to you.
Done-For-You
$150
per report · analyst-reviewed · 24-hour turnaround
Send the report, receive a complete attorney memo. No subscription, no retainer. Pay per report as cases arise.
  • Plain-English summary
  • Case strategy section
  • Daubert vulnerability flags
  • Deposition questions
  • Test-by-test translation
  • Psychologist + statistician validated
  • Add consultation call for +$75
Start With a Free Sample

First report free. No credit card required.

How we compare
CaseSignal AI Forensic Psychologist Reading It Yourself
Cost per report$150$900–$2,500+3–5 hrs billable time
Turnaround24 hoursDays to weeksImmediate
Daubert flags✓ Always includedIf you ask & pay✗ Requires psych training
Deposition questions✓ Always includedSeparate engagement✗ You write them blind
Output validated byPsychologist + statisticianThe expert themselvesYou
The Analyst Behind It

Columbia-trained.
Clinically grounded. Statistically rigorous.

Most AI tools produce confident-sounding outputs with nobody qualified reviewing them. Every CaseSignal analysis is validated by someone who holds both psychology degrees and a statistics background — two lenses that have to work together to catch what either one alone would miss.

Academic Background
Doctoral Research in Psychology · Columbia University, Provost Fellow, 4.0 GPA
M.S. Industrial & Organizational Psychology · University of Southern California
B.S. Psychology · Howard University
B.S. Biomedical Engineering · University of Virginia
Professional Background
Lead Statistician · Kaiser Permanente — clinical research programs
VP Business Analytics · Data Scientist · Sr. Manager Analytics · Fortune 500 financial and technology firms
"The question isn't whether the report looks authoritative. It's whether the statistics behind it actually support the conclusions."
Psychological evaluations used in legal proceedings rely on psychometric instruments — standardized tests with known validity properties, error rates, and normative ranges. Whether a specific T-score supports the conclusion drawn requires knowing the instrument, its published limitations, and whether the interpretation is statistically defensible.
How every analysis is validated
Score interpretations checked against published normative tables for that specific instrument
Daubert flags verified against the Mental Measurements Yearbook and peer-reviewed psychometric literature
Validity scale elevations reviewed for statistical significance before any flag is issued
Outputs that cannot be verified against published research are removed — not guessed at
Disclaimer: CaseSignal AI analysis is a research and preparation tool for attorneys. It does not constitute legal advice, psychological assessment, or expert opinion and should not be relied upon as such. All analyses are prepared to assist attorney preparation only.

Your first analysis.
No charge.

Send us one psychological evaluation report from a current or recent case. We'll return a complete attorney memo — all five sections — within 24 hours, at no cost. No commitment required.

We follow up personally within 4 business hours to coordinate secure report delivery. Redacted reports are welcome — no client information required.

Request received.
We'll be in touch within 4 business hours to coordinate your free sample analysis.